Shared Ownership vs. Traditional Buying: Which Is Better?

Shared Ownership vs. Traditional Buying: Which Is Better?

With rising house prices and increasing mortgage rates, many buyers are considering alternative routes to homeownership. Shared ownership has emerged as a popular option, but how does it compare to traditional buying? 

Affordability and accessibility 

Shared ownership allows buyers to purchase a portion of a property (typically between 25% and 75%) while paying rent on the remainder. This can make getting onto the property ladder more affordable, as deposits and mortgage payments are lower. Traditional buying, while requiring a larger upfront investment, provides full ownership and long-term equity growth. 

Flexibility vs. long-term investment 

Shared ownership offers flexibility, as buyers can increase their stake in the property over time. However, reselling a shared ownership home can be more complex than selling a fully owned property. Traditional homeownership provides greater control over modifications and potential market value increases. 

Which option suits you best? 

Choosing between shared ownership and traditional buying depends on your financial situation and long-term goals. If you’re exploring your options, contact us for expert advice on finding the best path to homeownership. 

 
Book a valuation for expert guidance on the next steps in your home buying journey
 
Categories: General


Bookmarking: